Legislation to protect children in the digital realm is essential. But if it results in the loss of small cycling and cancer-care forums, something’s gone wrongLondon Fixed Gear and Single-Speed (LFGSS) is an admirable online community of fixed-gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London. Sadly, this columnist does not qualify for membership: he doesn’t reside in (or near) the metropolis, and he requires a number of gears to tackle even the gentlest of inclines – and therefore admires hardier cyclists who disdain the assistance of Sturmey-Archer or Campagnolo hardware.There is, however, bad news on the horizon. After Sunday 16 March, LFGSS will be no more. Dee Kitchen, the software wizard (and cyclist) who is the core developer of Microcosm, a platform for running non-commercial, non-profit, privacy-sensitive, accessible online forums such as LFGSS, has announced that on that date he will “delete the virtual servers hosting LFGSS and other communities, and effectively immedi...
The main conceptual idea of the text is that overly broad and inflexible legislation aimed at online safety, like the UK's Online Safety Act (OSA), can have unintended negative consequences.
The author uses the planned closure of the London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed cycling forum (LFGSS) as an example. While the aim of the OSA is to protect users from online harms, its implementation by Ofcom, with its strict risk assessment requirements and deadlines, has forced the closure of this small, non-commercial community forum. This illustrates the danger of a "one size fits all" approach to online safety, which can stifle legitimate and valuable online spaces in the process of trying to protect users.
The author argues for a more nuanced and flexible approach to online safety regulation that takes into account the diverse needs and characteristics of different online communities.
The main conceptual idea of the text is that overly broad and inflexible legislation aimed at online safety, like the UK's Online Safety Act (OSA), can have unintended negative consequences. The author uses the planned closure of the London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed cycling forum (LFGSS) as an example. While the aim of the OSA is to protect users from online harms, its implementation by Ofcom, with its strict risk assessment requirements and deadlines, has forced the closure of this small, non-commercial community forum. This illustrates the danger of a "one size fits all" approach to online safety, which can stifle legitimate and valuable online spaces in the process of trying to protect users. The author argues for a more nuanced and flexible approach to online safety regulation that takes into account the diverse needs and characteristics of different online communities.